Editor's Note: Conventional wisdom says
your metabolic rate drops because you lose a little muscle each year.
However, Christian explains that muscle mass is not the only thing that
affects it.
Your basal metabolic rate - the number of calories your body burns each
day just to stay alive - tends to drop as you age.
According to conventional wisdom, this is because you lose a small amount of
muscle each year.
However, many people don't realize that muscle mass is not the only thing
that affects your basal metabolic rate.
In fact, studies show that your metabolic rate declines with age
independently of muscle loss. In other words, young physically active men
tend to have a higher metabolic rate than their older counterparts, even if
they have the same amount of muscle.
Why?
The age-related decline in metabolic rate - even when muscle mass is taken
into account - is because of two reasons.
First, there's a strong link between exercise volume and your metabolic
rate. In other words, the more exercise you do, the higher your metabolic
rate. The fact that people tend to exercise less as they age is partly
responsible for the drop in metabolic rate.
Second, metabolic rate is also linked to total calorie intake. This means
that the more you eat, the higher your metabolic rate. A reduced metabolic
rate in older physically active men could be due to the fact they eat less
than their younger counterparts.
Some evidence for this comes from a research group based at the University
of Colorado [1]. They compared a group of young and older inactive men with
physically active men of a similar age.
Even when differences in muscle mass between young and old subjects were
taken into account, basal metabolic rate was lower with age in both the
inactive and physically active subjects. The older men burned around 64-68
calories per hour, compared to 72-77 calories per hour in the younger
subjects.
However, when researchers compared older and younger subjects doing the same
amount of exercise and/or eating the same number of calories, there was no
difference in basal metabolic rate.
The same holds true in women as well as men. Research comparing
premenopausal and postmenopausal women shows that basal metabolic rate,
again adjusted for age-related muscle loss, was roughly 10% lower in
postmenopausal women who do no exercise [2].
But there was no difference in metabolic rate between premenopausal and
postmenopausal women who exercise regularly.
Energy Flux
The link between adjusted basal metabolic rate, exercise volume, and energy
intake involves a concept known as energy flux, which refers to the flow of
calories (or energy) through your body.
A high energy flux means that you're eating a large number of calories, but
balancing that with an equally high volume of exercise. A good example of
someone with a high energy flux would be a cyclist taking part in the Tour
de France.
Despite the fact these athletes eat thousands of calories each day, they're
so lean simply because they do so much exercise.
Someone following an extremely low-calorie diet while doing little or no
exercise is a perfect example of low energy flux.
A lot of people use this approach to lose weight. And it does work, if only
for a short time. If you cut your calorie intake too much for long, several
things will happen.
- You'll end up losing muscle as well as fat. Half of the weight lost on a
very low-calorie diet comes from muscle.
- You won't have the energy to exercise. The result is that your metabolic
rate will slow down, and weight loss will get harder.
The Bottom Line
The bottom line is that a drop in your metabolic rate is not an
inevitable consequence of aging, and has a lot more to do with the way you
live your life.
You can minimize the age-related drop in metabolic rate by maintaining a
high energy flux - balancing a nutrient-dense diet with regular exercise.
Not only will this help you stay lean, it's a great way to provide your body
with more of the vitamins, minerals and other nutrients it needs to stay
healthy.
(Note: If you've been putting off starting an exercise program because you
think you're too old or just too far gone, grab a copy of
Fit Over 40: Role
Models For Excellence At Any Age. You’ll find more than 50 inspiring real
life success stories which prove that you can boost your metabolism, gain
muscle and lose all the weight you want regardless of how old or out of
shape you are!)
Read other
articles by Christian Finn
| Recommended Links:
The Facts
About Fitness - do you need help burning the fat from your belly or
packing muscle on your chest, shoulders, and arms? Christian Finn's site
contains everything you need to know to achieve your fitness goals!
Burn The
Fat Feed The Muscle - an easy-to-follow fat-burning exercise and
diet program that works by Tom Venuto.
|
About the Author
Christian Finn is a Certified Personal Trainer and holds a masters degree
with distinction in exercise science. He's lectured at a number of universities
and private training organizations around the United Kingdom on fitness
training, weight loss and the effective use of nutritional supplements. He
writes extensively on the subject and his articles have been published in
numerous magazines, leading industry journals and websites worldwide, including
Men's Health, Men's Health Muscle, Fit Pro (April/May 2001), CAM magazine
(February 2003), Image (January 1997), Zest (March 2004), and Body Life magazine
(March/April 1997). He was also featured in the July 2004 issue of Muscle &
Fitness (UK edition). His website,
TheFactsAboutFitness.com, is dedicated to providing its members up-to-date,
unbiased information and research on the world of fitness.
References
1. van Pelt, R.E., Dinneno, F.A., Seals, D.R., & Jones, P.P. (2001).
Age-related decline in RMR in physically active men: relation to exercise
volume and energy intake. American Journal of Physiology, E281, 633-639
2. van Pelt, R.E., Jones, P.P., Davy, K.P., Desouza, C.A., Tanaka, H.,
Davy, B.M., & Seals, D.R. (1997). Regular exercise and the age-related
decline in resting metabolic rate in women. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology and Metabolism, 82, 3208-3212