Editor's Note: I was always under the
impression that a workout that consists of high intensity exercises first,
followed by low intensity exercises burns the most fat in the shortest
amount of time. This recent article by Christian Finn, however, says that
might not necessarily be the case...
It's the same old story. You promise yourself to exercise more but the main
challenge remains - trying to fit exercise into your busy schedule.
Most point to a lack of time as the main reason why they can't stick to a
regular exercise routine. That's why programs such as 8 Minutes in the Morning
or The Slow Burn Fitness Revolution have become so popular. They promise to help
you get in shape in less time and with less effort.
Recently, I've had a lot of questions about a technique called dual-rate
exercise. The idea is that you burn more fat during your workout (and, in
theory, lose fat faster) without exercising longer or harder.
Let's take a closer look at the research to see what it means for you.
Researchers from the College of New Jersey had college-age volunteers (eight men
and four women) visit the lab on two occasions. They measured total calories and
fat calories burned during 30 minutes of exercise on a stationary bike [2].
Visit #1 (low-to-high):
The subjects exercised at a low intensity (about 60% of their maximum heart
rate) for the first 15 minutes. For the last 15 minutes, they trained at a
higher intensity (roughly 80% of their maximum heart rate).
Visit #2 (high-to-low):
After a brief warm-up, subjects started at a high intensity for the first 15
minutes, and finished the last 15 minutes at a low intensity.
There wasn't much difference between the two workouts in terms of total calories
burned (280 calories for workout one versus 272 calories for workout two).
However, the volunteers burned roughly 23% more fat during the high-to-low
workout. This is the finding that's caused all the interest in dual-rate
exercise.
So, should you use a high-to-low exercise sequence in your next workout?
There's certainly no harm in trying it. But I'm not convinced that it'll make
much difference to the amount of fat you lose.
Why?
Firstly, you burn more fat during the post-exercise period with high- rather
than low-intensity exercise. I'm guessing that if the researchers had measured
fat metabolism during and after exercise, there wouldn't have been much
difference between the high-to-low and low-to-high workouts.
What's more, this is just one study. And the results haven't been replicated in
other trials.
Researchers from Brunel University, for example, measured fat metabolism during
two different workouts [1].
Workout one involved 15 minutes of high-intensity exercise at 75% VO2max,
followed by 40 minutes at a low intensity - 50% VO2max. Workout two comprised 40
minutes of low-intensity work, followed by 15 minutes of high-intensity work.
Unlike the earlier study, the results show no significant difference in the
number of fat calories burned during either session.
The bottom line
There's certainly nothing wrong with dual-rate exercise. In fact, the
fat-burning program I use follows a "high-low-high-low-high" pattern (see How to
fight fat and win in the Members-Only Area).
But don't get distracted by every new "wonder" program that you read about. Most
people who try chasing every rabbit that crosses their path end up suffering
from paralysis by analysis. They get confused by all the different ideas and
theories, and end up doing nothing.
It's a lot more important to work hard and be consistent, than to waste your
time and energy second-guessing whether the program you're using is "right" or
"wrong."
Read other
articles by Christian Finn
| Recommended Links:
The Facts
About Fitness - subscribe to Christian Finn's website today
and you'll enjoy immediate access to a "secret vault" of expert
knowledge and university-tested tips and tricks you can use to shed
stubborn fat once and for all.
Burn The
Fat Feed The Muscle - an easy-to-follow fat-burning exercise and
diet program that works by TomVenuto.
|
About the Author
Christian Finn is a Certified Personal Trainer and holds a masters degree
with distinction in exercise science. He's lectured at a number of universities
and private training organizations around the United Kingdom on fitness
training, weight loss and the effective use of nutritional supplements. He
writes extensively on the subject and his articles have been published in
numerous magazines, leading industry journals and websites worldwide, including
Men's Health, Men's Health Muscle, Fit Pro (April/May 2001), CAM magazine
(February 2003), Image (January 1997), Zest (March 2004), and Body Life magazine
(March/April 1997). He was also featured in the July 2004 issue of Muscle &
Fitness (UK edition). His website,
TheFactsAboutFitness.com, is dedicated to providing its members up-to-date,
unbiased information and research on the world of fitness.
References
1. Egan, D., & Head, T. (1999). Energy substrate metabolism during dual work
rate exercise: effects of order. Journal of Sports Science, 17, 889-894
2. Kang, J., Schweitzer, J.S., & Hoffman, J.R. (2003). Effect of order of
exercise intensity upon cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and perceptual
responses during exercise of mixed intensity. European Journal of Applied
Physiology, 90, 569-574